December 29, 1997

|
Notes from Internet Society Members Proposed law contrary to Internet spiritDear Editor: I am responding to your editorial of December 26, 1997 As a charter member of the Internet Society, I was amazed to learn that the local chapter is behind a push for a draconian Internet Law, one which would impose a standard of government control unequaled in the world Please be assured that most members of the Internet Society would find this whole issue particularly distasteful. The Internet was built as a place for open communication and sharing, and this proposed law is very much contrary to that spirit This law, if passed, would have only one effect:hinder Thailand's ability to become a vital part of the global information economy. On-line publishers would go to other countries, and businesses would hesitate to launch a presence on the globa linternet for fear of violating a vague, unenforcable law The Internet Society was founded to promote the internet, not to kill it. Your editorial was timely and necessary, and I hope your readers understand that not all members of the Internet Society would agree with the puzzling stand taken by the local chapter Carl Malamud Internet law not compatible with Internet Society PrinciplesDear Editor: The Bangkok Post Dec 26 editorial was brought to my attention The proposal, as you describe it, does not seem compatible with Internet Society Principles asset forth below. I hope that further dialog will result in proposals that are consistent with Internet Society principles Vint Cerf
Internet Society Principles
|