|
ECONOMY
Making
the most of state assets
Wichit Chantanusornsiri
 |
| The float of Airports of Thailand's
shares after it was privatised turned out to be a big
success. |
EVERY MONTH, the Finance Ministry dutifully reports what
could be considered an update on the country's balance sheet
_ tax revenues, budget expenditures, new borrowings and public
debt levels.
But while the country's liabilities are plain, assessing assets,
whether they be state land, concession rights granted to the
private sector, or state enterprise holdings, is more difficult.
Raising the value of state assets has been a key element of
the government's economic platform. Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra,
in a speech in 2003, argued that raising the value of assets
held by state enterprises alone by 10% would generate the equivalent
of 100 billion baht for taxpayers.
According to the Finance Ministry, Thailand's 64 state enterprises
have a collective asset value of 5.66 trillion baht, with liabilities
of 5.11 trillion and capital of 545 billion. Looking at the balance
sheet as a whole, state enterprises offer a return on assets
of 2.57%, a return on equity of 26.73% and have a debt-to-equity
ratio of 9.39 times.
The push to increase asset values and financial performance
for state enterprises has been the main driver of the country's
privatisation plan. By transforming state enterprises into public
companies, divesting a minority share to the public and listing
the companies on the stock exchange, the government hopes to
expose state agencies to market forces, deepen and broaden the
capital market and investor base and raise funds to reduce the
public debt and burden on taxpayers.
The privatisation process to date has focused on the most profitable
and professionally run state enterprises. Some, such as Krung
Thai Bank and Thai Airways International, have long been traded
on the Stock Exchange of Thailand but are set to see their state
holdings reduced further. Others, such as PTT Plc and Airports
of Thailand, have undergone privatisation as a first step toward
eventual sector liberalisation.
As in other countries, state enterprises were first established
to provide products and services that the private sector otherwise
was unable or unwilling to offer. In some sectors, such as petrochemicals,
telecommunications or electricity, state enterprises were necessary
to overcome the immaturity of the local capital market. Development
banks such as the Bank for Agriculture and Agricultural Co-operatives
or the Government Housing Bank were needed to further state policy
objectives in ways that private enterprise could not.
But with economic development and the increasing importance
played by the private sector in the overall economy, the shift
now is for state enterprises to scale back their activities and
monopolies to allow the private sector to compete in offering
public services. The 1997 constitution explicitly calls for free
competition within the economy, with the state limited to playing
a regulatory role overseeing private operators.
As the government moves to restructure state enterprises, a
parallel initiative is under way to increase the value of state
assets. The Treasury Department, a Finance Ministry unit that
oversees 12.5 million rai of land nationwide, has explicitly
announced a plan to increase the commercial returns from its
land portfolio through concession contracts with private developers.
In Bangkok, examples of the policy include a 19-billion-baht
project to develop 63 rai formerly used by the Mor Chit bus terminal,
as well as a project to construct a luxury hotel beside the Chao
Phraya River by using a century-old building previously used
by the Fire Department and Customs Department.
|