The
farm sector has been a major focus of attention from the new government
since Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra took office in February.
 |
|
A display of the new strain of fragrant
rice called Hom Nil. According to the National Centre for
Genetic Engineerring and Biotechnology, the new strain contains
12.5% protein, compared with 6%for jasmine rice. Hom Nil
is rich in calcium zinc and potassium. |
The government
is seeking to implement its promises and promote equality from
the grass-roots level upward, through three ambitious projects:
farm debt suspension for three years, village funds of one million
baht per community nationwide and the One Tambon, One Product
scheme.
The framework
for the projects is in place, but in terms of public policy
gains or substantial benefits to the public, few positive outcomes
have emerged so far.
Customers
of the Bank for Agriculture and Agricultural Co-operatives (BAAC),
who owe the bank less than 100,000 baht each, are eligible for
assistance under the debt-suspension programme.
About 1.16
million farmers, with debts totalling 53.7 billion baht, have
joined the programme, which also prevents them from applying
for new loans.
But these
farmers will receive higher interest rates on deposits up to
50,000 baht and be enrolled in job training to ensure that they
will be able to repay their debts after three years.
Another
1.1 million farmers, owing 36.9 billion baht, preferred to stay
out of the programme as they found the incentives unattractive.
The incentives
include a three-percentage-point reduction in interest rates
on loans, an additional percentage point on deposits up to 50,000
baht, emergency credit of 30,000 baht, a maximum 100,000-baht
credit for future business, the chance to win education funds,
life insurance and health-care, and the right to join the job
rehabilitation plan.
Advocates
of the government's approach may argue that more than two million
farmers have already benefited from the scheme, but other analysts
say the core issue is career rehabilitation, in which there
has been little progress.
As of mid-November,
only 6,260 farmers had received assistance out of the 40,733
whose rehabilitation plans and projects had been approved. This
is only 0.5% of the total number of farmers who should receive
assistance.
Altogether,
128,247 farmers from 4,348 tambons requested training under
the programme.
Praphat
Panyachartrak, a deputy agriculture minister, said inadequate
farm databases and misunderstandings among state officials about
the programme had contributed to the delay.
Inefficiencies
at agriculture technology centres at the district level also
hindered programme implementation, he said.
 |
|
Several ostrich farms are located
in the Northeast. Ostrich meat is considered high quality
and is now sold locally. The Ministry of Agriculture and
Co-operatives says commercial ostrich farms are viable,
particularly in the Northeast, although they require considerable
up-front investment. |
In November,
after numerous demands for state assistance from members of
agricultural co-operatives, Mr Praphat said the government would
pay an interest subsidy of 3% for three years, to small co-operatives'
clients who owed less than 100,000 baht, and had not yet participated
in the BAAC's debt-suspension scheme.
The ministry
estimates it will pay out 3.588 billion baht over three years
to assist 1.08 million individuals who owe a total of 32.5 billion
baht.
The 670,000
farmers who borrowed money as members of 3,399 groups owe 337
million baht.
The one-million-baht
village fund appears to be further along the road toward its
goal, though the results have been mixed to say the least. Almost
all of the 74,881 villages have opened accounts for money to
be transferred. The government began transferring the funds
on July 25 and about 70% of the total had been disbursed to
the village accounts as of early December.
Approximately
50% of the total funds transferred had already been borrowed
by villagers, bringing smiles to the faces of government officials
who argue the mechanism is working well.
But critics
caution that more than half of the loans are being wasted and
misused. Some villagers have been using the money to repay old
debts to loan sharks rather than investing in starting their
own businesses. In one notable case, an amphetamine dealer in
Si Sa Ket admitted to having used money from the fund to stock
up on supplies.
Villagers
lacked proper understanding of the fund's goals, while supervisory
officials were ill-trained, critics have said.
Some government
agencies have been educating villagers to better understand
the financial and loan approval system but it is an arduous
task, and another contribution to the delays in this project.
Although
unemployed undergraduates were recruited to handle the village
funds, people have complained that the selection process was
not fair and local MPs interfered by bringing their own people
into the area.
The government
wants to use the project to stimulate the local economy and
expects it to be more effective than the Miyazawa Fund, put
in place in 1999 by the previous administration.
The success
or failure of the village funds has yet to be clearly determined,
but analysts agree it has helped debt-suspended farmers, banned
from receiving new loans from the BAAC, to seek new capital.
But it is
clear that the one-tambon, one-product project has been implemented
inefficiently, with widespread confusion, because all government
agencies want to get credit for promoting each tambon to have
its own product. However, not all tambons in the country have
the potential to make a product. Marketing is an even bigger
challenge.
Many villagers
still believe that under the terms of the project, the government
would allocate assistance funds to help them directly. But instead,
the assistance will mainly be in the form of marketing, training
and technology transfer.
The government
is now reviewing all 6,340 projects registered under the project.
A national oversight committee has been appointed, chaired by
Deputy Prime Minister Pongpol Adireksarn.
In terms
of support to major farm products, the government has given
priority to rice as the crop involves more than half of all
the farmers in the country.
The Commerce
Ministry has pledged that its paddy price intervention programme
is different from those of previous governments. In fact, the
theory and mechanisms are identical to earlier schemes that
all had the same goal: a better paddy price for farmers, particularly
during the harvesting period.
The only
new variation is a programme specifically for the highest-grade
fragrant paddy.
The government
said it would buy all fragrant paddy at 6,500 baht a ton, far
higher than the market price of 5,000 to 5,200 baht.
It also
set an intervention price at 5,235 baht per ton for 5% white
rice and 5,650 baht for sticky rice.
It plans
to spend 53 billion baht to absorb 8.7 million tons of paddy,
4.7 million tons of fragrant rice, three million tons of white
rice and one million tons of glutinous rice.
The project
started on Nov 15 but only 81,732 tons of fragrant rice were
pledged after 25 days of operations. Siripol Yodmuangcharoen,
director-general of the Internal Trade Department said another
448,100 tons of white rice were pledged.
He claimed
that the measures had helped reduce the gap between the guaranteed
and market prices. The project will finish at the end of February.
As of Dec
11, a BAAC official said there had been no reports about the
amount of pledged paddy. He said that normally farmers did not
begin entering the pledging scheme until late December.
But Pramote
Vanichanont, president of the Thai Rice Mills Association, argues
that the government failed to understand the behaviour of farmers
in the Northeast.
He said
they were small farmers who normally sold only a few sacks of
paddy after harvesting so they would not bother to enter the
scheme and would sell paddy at market prices.
Exporters
are unhappy with the government measure because it has pushed
up the domestic rice price. To avoid huge losses in the future,
they have boosted the volume of rice exports. The country will
export a record 7.3 million tons of rice this year, for which
Commerce Minister Adisai Bodharamik is claiming credit.
Mr Adisai
has been fortunate due to a disaster in Vietnam that prompted
its government to halt rice exports until February. The price
of rice in Vietnam is now higher than in Thailand. Local mills
are expecting the government to take this opportunity to clear
up its stockpile of almost two million tons of rice, carried
over from the previous government, by increasing exports.
Mr Pramote
said it was disappointing, however, that Mr Adisai, who claimed
he would be able to clear the whole stock in 2001, had sold
the stock to local exporters.
He said
that as a consequence, the policy would hurt paddy prices as
exporters had no need to purchase rice milled from freshly harvested
paddy in the market. No one dares to predict the outlook for
rice next year and the market is now adjusting its expectations
week by week.
But one
farm product that has been in good shape for the whole year
is tapioca, with the price of fresh cassava roots moving above
one baht per kilogramme, due to the poor grain and maize output
in the European Union, China and the United States.
The outlook
for cassava planters is also brightening now that China has
entered the World Trade Organisation.
Beijing
has agreed to cut tariffs on imported tapioca pellets to 8%
from 10%, on flour to 28% from 30%, and on starch to 16% from
20%.
China is
becoming a major market for Thailand, importing 1.6 million
tons of tapioca products during January to September 2001, compared
with only 130,000 tons the year before.
Fresh pineapple
is likely to fetch a good price in 2002 due to reduced output.
The government
has attempted to restructure the pineapple industry in Thailand
by setting up a tripartite corporation to oversee the exports
of canned pineapple to ensure good prices.
But the
policy has failed so far due to conflict among the related parties.
Although
Thailand still faces anti-dumping penalties in the United States,
Thai pineapple exporters are still likely to be able to compete
in the industry.
Rubber still
has poor prospects, despite the attempt by the world's three
leading producers _ Indonesia, Thailand and Malaysia _ to stimulate
the world price by stockpiling and cutting production.
Thai rubber
planters are suffering as prices plummet, with rubber sheet
quoted at only 15 baht a kilogramme and latex at 13 baht in
December.
But on a
brighter note, before the end of this year there was the successful
launch of a new round of world trade negotiations that included
the commitment to move toward greater liberalisation of farm
products by phasing out all forms of subsidies.